The Maximum-Power Stimulus Theory For Muscle
Joseph Mastropaolo, Ph.D.
The maximum-power stimulus theory was valid without exception or failure
for a variety of sports on land, in the water and in the air, for a
range of competencies from quadriplegics to elite athletes of both genders,
and in age brackets from childhood to old age. It proved more potent
and efficient than rival theories including hormonal stimulation, like
anabolic steroids, and permitted achieving national or world ranking
status in mere weeks whereas rival methods of training had failed for
years. The theory simplified and unified maximal muscle performance
and solved enigmas that go back 2500 years to the first Olympic Games.
There are links to physics and chemistry as well as physiological mechanisms
known from biochemistry. The theory functions by the arousal from DNA
of unmanifested muscle proteins that provide structural and functional
advantages within 24 hours. It permitted mathematical modeling and predicted
objectively, accurately and reliably. It illuminated allied theoretical
questions like specificity of training, overtraining, and the limits
of muscle performance. From the first series of successful experiments
in 1967 identifying the hypothesis, there were numerous opportunities
to discover exceptions or weaknesses or some conceivable link to evolution,
but none were found. As far as the numerous experiments over a span
of 25 years could determine, the theory objectively, validly and reliably
explains a complex, quickly reactive design that is universal and the
antithesis of evolution.
Abraham Trembley and the Hydra
Abraham Trembley studied and experimented with the hydra, a small,
fresh water animal, in the eighteenth century. The methods of locomotion
used by this simple animal are complex, giving evidence for an intelligent
Designer. An overview of Trembleys discoveries and experiments
is presented. Also included is a discussion of his outstanding methodology,
as a result of which he is today regarded as the father of experimental
zoology. Trembleys role as an educator is also considered,
as well as the influence of his religion on his work.
Lack of Evidence for Subduction
Renders Plate Tectonics Unlikely
Part IIExtension Dominant at "Convergent
Michael J. Oard
Instead of areas of massive convergence, extension predominates at
subduction zones. The lack of geological and geophysical evidence for
subduction calls into question the plate tectonics paradigm. The paradigm
of vertical tectonics provides an alternative to plate tectonics.
A Critique of the Literary Framework View of the Days of Creation
Andrew S. Kulikovsky
The Literary Framework view of the days of creation is becoming increasingly
popular among evangelicals today. Advocates hold to a non-concordist
view of Genesis and modern science and attempt to demonstrate that Genesis
1 was never intended to communicate scientific truth or literal history.
Although they still affirm that the characters and events of Genesis
1 are historical, they deny that such events actually occurred in the
way Genesis appears to describe them. This paper focuses in particular
on the Literary Framework views of Meredith G. Kline and Henri Blocher,
and demonstrates that such views have no exegetical or theological basis
whatsoever. In addition, a defence of the traditional, literal, historical
interpretation is also presented.